NDTV has accessed more than one FIRs and police complaints towards the convicts, which runs contrary to the justification of the Gujarat government that the convicts have been launched for desirable behaviour.

Defending the early release of 11 men convicted of raping Bilkis Bano and killing her complete own family in the 2002 Gujarat riots, the Gujarat government noted “exact behaviour” and the Centre’s approval.
But the “good behaviour” claim has been shredded by using FIRs found out in opposition to the convicts, who spent lots of days on parole even earlier than their untimely release.

NDTV has accessed more than one FIRs and police lawsuits in which the convicts are accused of threatening and harassing witnesses whilst out on parole. In their “desirable behaviour” justification, the Gujarat government even claimed there has been no proof of any wrongdoing by using the convicts while they had been serving time in prison, and while they have been out on parole.

Between 2017-2021, as a minimum four witnesses inside the Bilkis Bano case registered proceedings and FIRs against the convicts, NDTV’s investigation reveals.

NDTV has accessed one FIR and two police lawsuits.

*An FIR dated July 6, 2020, changed into registered towards of the convicts, Radheshyam Shah and Miteshbhai Bhatt whilst they were out on parole.

The FIR (First Information Report) turned into filed at Radhikapur police station in Dahod under Sections 354 (assault or criminal pressure with intention to outrage modesty), 504 (intimidation), 506 (2) (chance to kill) and 114 (abetment) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by means of Saberaben Patel, and a witness inside the Bilkis Bano case, Pintubhai.

The FIR says 3 guys, along with the 2 convicts and Radheshyam’s brother Ashish, threatened Saberaben, her daughter Arfa and witness Pintubhai for implicating them with their statements.

*Mansuri Abdul Razzaq Abdul Majid, every other witness, filed a police grievance with Dahod police against Sailesh Chimmanlal Bhatt on January 1, 2021. He, too, alleged threats from the convict even as he turned into out on parole.

This complaint in no way became an FIR.
Two other witnesses, Ghanchi Adambhai Ismailbhai and Ghanchi Imtiazbhai Yusufbhai, filed a grievance in opposition to one of the convicts, Govind Nai, on July 28, 2017. The candidates alleged that the accused threatened to kill them if they didn’t “compromise”, whilst Nai become out on parole. This complaint additionally by no means was an FIR.

The convicts were freed on August 15 Independence Day and greeted with garlands and chocolates like heroes out of doors a prison in Gujarat.

The Supreme Court remarked the day gone by that Gujarat’s defence quoted a series of judgments but ignored authentic statements.

“I have now not come across a counter affidavit in which a series of judgments are quoted. Factual announcement should had been made. A very bulky counter. Where is the factual announcement, in which is the utility of thoughts?” a bench headed with the aid of Justice Ajay Rastogi discovered.

Union Minister Prahlad Joshi defended the convicts’ launch, bringing up their “suitable behaviour”.

“When the authorities and the worried humans have taken the choice, I do not find some thing wrong in it as it is a manner of regulation,” Mr Joshi informed NDTV.

Reacting to the outrage over the “law” applied on convicts sentenced for what the CBI referred to as a “heinous, grave and severe” crime, the Minister echoed Gujarat’s “precise behaviour” argument.

“After having been in jail for a while, if their behaviour…There are such a lot of incidents, I don’t want to get into that,” Mr Joshi said.

By News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!